In the middle of the confected ‘controversy’ about the second assessment report of the IPCC, [fossil-funded denialists smearing Ben Santer] various scientists, including Santer himself, point out some inconvenient facts….
In the July 4 1996 issue of Nature, Benjamin Santer, K.E. Taylor, Tom M. Wigley, and ten other researchers published an article that concluded: “The observed spatial patterns of temperature change in the free atmosphere from 1963 to 1987…are similar to those predicted by state-of-the-art climate models… It is likely that this trend is partially due to human activities,…
Gelbspan, R. (1998) Page 220
“A more organised opposition to the IPCC’s conclusions began in the USA on Earth Day (22 April 1996), with a message distributed widely, including to every member of the US Congress, and with the first issue of the State of the Climate Report attached in which the IPCC conclusions were challenged. However, just as this report was about to be published, the Union of Concerned Scientists denounced it in a press release, based on earlier contributions to the media debate about global warming by the man in charge, Patrick Michaels: “The forthcoming climate change report sponsored by Western Fuels Association is like a lung cancer study funded by the tobacco industry.””
(Bolin, 2007: 128)
Also on this day
1990 New South Wales conservative premier Nick Greiner gives a speech – “The new environmentalism : a conservative perspective”
1998 Hockey Stick paper (Michael Mann) published
As ever, see the disclaimers, help the project and comments policy.