Category Archives: reports

April 6, 2006 – Business says it wants ‘long, loud and legal’ framework

One of the key ways the Howard government and its allies were able to keep climate change off the agenda between 1996 and 2006 was to say that business was united in opposition to more-than-voluntary commitments.  This was never true, and by 2006, some businesses were both willing and able to stick their heads above the parapet.

The Australian Business Roundtable on Climate Change, a gathering of various businesses including Westpac, Origin, BP said the Howard government should get real. It was front page news on the Melbourne Age, a sign that climate change was climbing the political agena…

Colebatch, T. and Myer, R. (2006) Companies urge action on warming The Age. 7 April p.1.Climate change threatens us all: executives

SIX of Australia’s biggest companies have broken ranks to call on the Federal Government to take tough action to reduce Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions, including some form of charge on carbon emissions and a binding target.

The companies – Westpac, BP, power company Origin Energy, paper giant Visy and insurers Swiss Re and IAG – say it is now clear that greenhouse gas emissions are causing hotter and more unstable weather, and could lead to serious costs for agriculture, tourism, and Australian business generally.

CSIRO research commissioned for the study warns that even a rise of two degrees in global temperatures could bleach the Great Barrier Reef, dry up most of Kakadu’s wetlands, cut the livestock capacity of inland Australia by 40 per cent, and deplete Australia’s snowfields.

IAG chief executive Michael Hawker, speaking yesterday at the release of the group’s report, blamed climate change for a massive rise in weather-related calamities, including cyclones, floods, high winds and hailstorms.

Days later, an anonymous and lying-down-with-denialists writer at Crikey was underwhelmed.

….

Finally – but by no means least – it also ignores the hypocrisy that these companies are all investing or benefiting from investing in the economic growth engines of
China and India where the real challenges lie in allowing growth while controlling emissions, and where most of the world’s future greenhouse gas emissions will come from.

This is not corporate leadership on climate change. It is unctuous spin. Or what’s sometimes called hot air.

May 16th, 1972- “Carbon and the Biosphere” symposium

Forty three years ago a hundred scientists gathered for a three day symposium on the “carbon budget” of the planet, and how it was changing.
We have known about this problem for a looooooong time.

AEC Symposium Series 
CARBON  and the BIOSPHERE 

Technical Information Center, Office of Information Services' 
UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION 
CONF-720510 
Proceedings of the 24th Brookhaven Symposium in Biology, Upton, New York 
May 16-18, 1972 

Sponsored by Brookhaven National Laboratory 

Editors 
George M. Woodwell 
Erene V. Pecan 
August 1973 
Published by 
Technical Information Center, Office of Information Services 
UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION 

Available as CONF-720510 for $10.60 from 

National Technical Information Service 
U. S. Department of Commerce 
Springfield, Virginia 22151 

International Standard Book Number 0-87079-006-4 
Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 73-600092 
AEC Distribution Category UC-48 


PREFACE 
The change that man is making in the world carbon budget is among the most abrupt and fundamental changes that the biosphere has experienced in all of world history. The change is in the stuff of life itself and is by now common knowledge. The starkly simple, upward-trending graphs of the C0 2 content of air  at Mauna Loa have become a part of the educated man's background in science. But the implications of the change are far less clear than the fact of change. Why has the change not been more?  Or less? Where does the carbon go? What does the future hold? 

The topic is of unquestioned importance and has been addressed recently by various learned groups (SCEP,* 1970; SMIC,t 1971; and at the Nobel Symposium 20, i 1971). These studies have emphasized that prediction is dependent not only on 
collaboration among scientists of diverse disciplines but on new knowledge: the biosphere is poorly known. 

More than a hundred scientists gathered at Brookhaven National Laboratory from May 16 to 18, 1972, under the auspices of the 24th Brookhaven Symposium in Biology to make a new appraisal of the world carbon budget. The appraisal was incomplete. Despite an explicit attempt to include it, there was no treatment of one of the largest and most active pools of carbon: humus and peat. Nonetheless, this publication includes specific attempts at presenting the most modern estimates of various dimensions of the biota, including both biomass and productivity. Many of these estimates are crude, a fact that emphasizes only that the science of the biosphere is still primitive, despite its obvious importance.

Also on this day

2011 Ukipper MEP tells Taiwanese parliament CC is doubted… Comedy gold!!

 

As ever, see the disclaimers, help the project and comments policy.

Jan 12, 2000: National Academies of Science and Engineering release Another Report

On January 12th, 2000 the National Research Council of the National Academies of Science and of Engineering releases a report with new evidence that “Helps Reconcile Global Warming Discrepancies; Confirms That Earth’s Surface Temperature Is Rising.” For all the good that will do.

Context:Throughout the 90s satellite data that appeared to show that “Global Warming Isn’t Happening” was rolled out with depressing frequency. After this report, and others (see a skeptical science bust-a-myth page here), that particular meme was, if not totally retired, then at least relegated to the darker corners of the interwebz.

As ever, see the disclaimers, help the project and comments policy.

Other things that happened on this day:

1983 – Carroll Wilson, author of “Inadvertent Climate Modification: Report of the Study of Man’s Impact on Climate.” died

2007  – Lawrence Solomon writes an article for his “Deniers” column that implies that Nigel Weiss, Professor Emeritus at the Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics thinks the “world is about to enter a cooling period.”  It takes Weiss three months to get an apology and correction.  See Hoggan, 2009, page 158-161