Daily Archives: February 27, 2017

Feb 28, 2003 – Business Council scraps its outright Kyoto opposition

The Howard government’s ability to constrain public pressure for climate change action had in part rested on the claim that business was united in its opposition to, say, Kyoto Protocol ratification.  This was always nonsense (do you think renewable energy proponents, or carbon traders, or insurers, for instance, would be opposed? What about the gas industry?).  But this appearance of unity was assisted by the Business Council of Australia.  Eventually, however, the internal ructions became too much, and it moved from opposition to ‘no position’.  Then Hugh Morgan became President.  And it was only at the end of 2006 that things shifted. Fortunately, we have loads of time to deal with climate change, so the additional wait didn’t matter. Oh yes…

“Business support for the Federal Government’s hardline position on climate change is crumbling, with the Business Council yesterday scrapping its outright opposition to the Kyoto Protocol.”
Garnaut, J. 2003. Business shifts tack on Kyoto. The Age, 1 March.

Also on this day –

Chamberlin, P. 1995. Cabinet to review gas reduction options. Canberra Times, 28 February  p.2.
“A plan to take Australia about 40 per cent of the way towards meeting international obligations on reducing greenhouse gas emissions will be discussed by the Cabinet today, with schemes designed to tempt top-level industry involvement.”

2007  The denialists got going, with a launch at Parliament House for this little doozy –  Nine Facts about Climate Change Ray Evans [Originally published in November 2006 as a PDF (click here, 1.5 Mb). Launched in Canberra by Sir Arvi Parbo on 28 February 2007](Parbo had been a founder of the Business Council of Australia, btw).

Feb 28, 2007 – Malcolm on Renewables – we’ve come full circle…. #auspol #climate

Ten years ago today Malcolm Turnbull

counselled an assembled pack of press gallery journalists, saying ‘You cannot run a modern economy on wind farms and solar panels. It’s a pity that you can’t , but you can’t.”
(Prest, 2007: 254)

Then he came unstuck (or rather, was taken apart) on support for Kevin Rudd’s Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme in November 2009 (the best accounts I’ve read are Paul Kelly’s Triumph and Demise, and Phillip Chubb’s Power Failure).

He had enough momentum to then call the ‘Direct Action’ scheme of his usurper, Tony Abbott ‘bullshit.’ And in mid-2010 he happily launched Beyond Zero Emissions Stationary Energy Plan.

And now. Well, in his speeches Turnbull seems indistinguishable from Abbott (some take comfort in his mentions of energy storage, or his actions in installing panels and batteries in his Point Piper mansion).

What happened?  Well, Robert Manne reckons we should look the man’s history as a barrister

Malcolm Turnbull is a barrister by training and inclination. For him, causes are quasi-clients that he voluntarily and serially embraces – with the kind of sincerity barristers must routinely muster in a court of law – in order to advance his career. At a certain moment, however, Turnbull appears to realise that this or that cause poses a danger to his progress. At this moment, the cause is quietly dropped, with as much dignity and disguise as possible. It is dropped because in the end there is only one cause that ultimately counts for him – the cause of Malcolm Turnbull. Perhaps almost all successful politicians have this quality to some degree. But with Turnbull, it appears to be definitive.


Prest, J. 2007: The Bald Hills wind farm debacle. Pp.230- 261 in  Bonyhady, T. and Christoff, P. (eds)  2007. Climate Law in Australia. Sydney: The Federation Press.