The second assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change was released in 1995-6. It was attacked by the denialists and the fossil-fuel lobby, in part because momentum was building for an international treaty to not just stabilise emissions, but reduce them. The narrative that the denialists chose was that one scientist, Ben Santer, had somehow taken over the process and edited out all uncertainties. This was nonsense of course, but nonsense that the Wall Street Journal was happy to print. Santer tried to respond-
Santer immediately drafted a letter to the [Wall Street] Journal, which forty of the other IPCC lead authors signed. Santer explained what had happened, how he had been instructed by Houghton to make the changes, and why the changes were late in coming. At first the Journal wouldn’t publish it. After three tries, Santer finally got a call from the Journal’s letters editor and the letter was finally published on June 25. Santer’s reply had been heavily edited, and the names of the forty other cosigners deleted.
Oreskes and Conway, 2010 Page 208
The denialism continues down unto this day, almost 20 years later. There are some serious design flaws in the human species. Oh well.
Also on this day
The peak in articles in June 2008 is partly due to a Shell-sponsored CCS supplement in the Guardian on 25 June which contained 14-articles, all focusing on CCS.
Page 234 of Mander et al (2013)